I'm happy with the way I played today, and I have no complaints.". Rusedski completed the task, 4-6, 6-4, 6-3.Draper required five match points in defeating Chang, who fought back after losing the opening set and actually had a match point in the third set tie-break. Yesterday, he appeared to have squandered his opportunity after failing to convert any of three match points at 5-4 in the third set.Ullyett, having forced a tie-break, created two match points of his own. She also found time to contribute two chapters, as well as much informed criticism, to Basil Gray's highly original The English Print (1937); Helen Sutherland's copy is inscribed "from the authors".This in turn led to XIXth Century Ornamented Types and Title Pages (1938). The NBA, aware that there is no precedent for a player defaming an entire religious movement, has reacted tentatively so far."If that's what he said, it's indefensible. It's fine for Hoddle to speak of getting closer to Brazil but a persistent thought is that they are still some way short of realising their full potential.. This is a rating devised in the 1960s by the American Institute for Scientific Information, and has become the only internationally accepted ranking for journals.

It works by counting the number of times a journal's articles are cited by other academics in their papers. The higher the citation rating, the more desirable a journal becomes in its field.According to Bob Campbell of Blackwell, when the RAE announced that it would be using the impact factor in its assessment of research quality the scramble to get published in the best journals went up a notch "I've had editors receiving 17 papers a week. You see them wandering around looking shell-shocked by it all."Even Nature, probably the world's most eminent scientific journal, is feeling the pressure, according to its physical sciences editor, Carl Ziemelis. Only 10 per cent of Nature's papers originate in the UK, and only one in three gets as far as a peer review. Nature is looking not only for academic excellence but also for the potential of a piece of research to interest a wide general audience - and this may not please authors."We have had authors who have been rejected on the phone querying the decision.

And we get the feeling that our reviewers are under great pressure. Sometimes we simply hear nothing from them, although we try to persuade them to let us know if they cannot review what we send them," Carl Ziemelis says.As well as complaining to editors, authors have other tricks up their sleeves to try to ensure publication. Editors in one multi-disciplinary field have banded together to try to prevent multiple submissions. Even the most humble journal emulates Nature in demanding exclusive publication rights. "If we found a paper had been duplicated we simply would not consider it," Carl Ziemelis says.Another ploy is to spin a single piece of research out into as many papers as possible.

[...]